Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Marriage. Community and Austen - Final Part

From the very beginning of the story, we are told how all the families wish to have their daughters “married well”, but based on evidence already presented, this “wellness” is clearly referring to worldly matters and social advantages, of which the society / community approves. Charlotte herself admits that she is not and has never been “romantic” and “considering Mr. Collins’s character, connections, and situation in life” she is sure that her “chance of happiness with him is as fair, as most people can boast on entering the marriage state”, which is clearly a criticism on the society and its attitudes regarding marriage. Therefore, we can claim that their marriage is completely approved by and based on social conventions and that “the relationship between Charlotte and Collins presents a complete abandonment of personal claims in favour of social claims”. On the extreme opposite we can claim that a marriage such as Wickham and Lydia’s has little social claims and may be based completely on their personal claims and so they are seen as “the violators of sacred convention”.

Between these two extremes, we have Darcy and Elizabeth, whose marriage shows a balance between personal and social claims, what Austen is advocating, in a sense. Both Elizabeth and Darcy have to give up part of their prior claims: Darcy his pride and Elizabeth her prejudice towards him. Before marriage Elizabeth is seen very much as an individual who both in attitude and action, denies and condemns the conventions of the society. She refuses to marry Mr. Collins or anyone else where there are no true affections involved. Her opinions regarding marriage extend to her sister and her friend Charlotte and hence she criticizes Charlotte on her choice. So she is a “headstrong foolish girl’ who will not be brought to reason in the light of the expectations of her community. Darcy, on the other hand, pays more heed to the customs regarding social class, financial situation, and the expectations and conventions involved in choosing a partner. Yet after their marriage things are different for both. After marriage they leave Longbourne and settle in Pemberley, which symbolically means that they withdraw from the community and its conventions. But they still receive their family and friends at their house, which would still get them involved in the community and its people rather than completely abandoning it.

It can be seen that “the Collins-Charlotte and Wickham-Lydia marriages help to dramatize the possible fate of a girl in Elizabeth’s social position”, but at the same time and most importantly they “show by contrast the desirability and integrity of the adjustment between Darcy and Elizabeth. Through this Austen is suggesting that neither a complete yielding to the conventions of society nor a breach of them will ensure happiness. This is probably the reason why the story did not finish with their marriage, so as to show the “desirability” of their life once they had achieved a balance between their duties as members of the community and their personal happiness.

[i] Mordecai, Marcus, “A Major Thematic Pattern,” Twentieth Century Interpretations of Pride and Prejudice, E. Rubinstein, ed. (New Jersey: Prentice – Hall, Inc., 1969) 87.

5 comments:

  1. Please don't go away, Marzieh, because i'm getting much closer to being able to read and finish the book and to see the film.

    I would LOVE to discuss the themes and characters with you.

    Are you observing Eid and if so, a Joyous one!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The hour is too late for me to tell you how much my mother and I enjoyed the film: the beauty of each scene - colors- lighting, the music and exquisite acting, expressions, the smallest changes on the face and in a gesture. Of course the emotion comes through the film and catches by surprise.

    This film was filled with so much that is universal in that all over the world. The humor is throughout with the clash of persons ill suited for one another as well as the clash of those who find themselves eventually in each other's arms. The smiles come easily with the curious daughters and Mom listening behind closed doors.

    The commonalities are shown so simply in that parents and relatives want for their children's future well-being. Yet in perhaps many cultures the elders are simply not always understanding about the part the less tangible aspects and dynamics play in relationships: the requirements that love is likely to be achievable in short duration of time if not present before serious measures are taken toward promise and commitment.

    I liked that this film took a different twist from many romances which assume that opposites attract and that kind of set-up is necessary for passion and love. Whereas this story indicates that compatibility of nature, similarities of personal disposition, mutual interests and other characteristics play a greater role toward satisfying actual love.
    So many years of history and still few appear to have understood this principle.

    I need to go yet will try to come back to describe a little more with you, Marzieh before I take off completely from Commenting here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry to ramble - let me know if I didn't make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You have distinguished between Personal Claims and Social Claims and I think this is a good framework to understand marriage.

    There are instances where men and women are very conservative and so aren't really aware of their personal claims. Of course they would have to discover them at some point if they want a full and rich relationship. They would inevitably miss out until they discovered them.

    Social Claims have great importance as well. I think there is a wisdom hidden in them; this [wisdom] is a lesson in responsibility each member of society is taught before they enter marriage.

    With both personal and social claims met a full and rich marriage is possible.

    How well Jane Austin has brought out this subject! Interestingly the book seems so daunting that I could never have read it despite knowing it is a classic.

    Thank you for bringing out this important subject.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Connie and The Saint,

    Thank you both for comments. I loved them both touching on different aspects of the novel and the movie.

    I hope to come back a little later with more time ( now I'm off to see my professor!) to read them again and leave some more comments ...

    ReplyDelete